Franz Kafka: Building a Great Wall to Create a Secure Foundation for a New Tower of Babel / The real fun side of writing

[Untitled]: photo by Tonatiuh Cabello, 4 March 2017

You have to dive down, as it were,
and sink more rapidly
than that which sinks in advance of you.

A boy peeks out of the window of his house in Nuevo Laredo, Tamaulipas state, Mexico, across the border from Laredo in the U.S, on Friday: photo by Rodrigo Abd/AP, 24 March 2017

The Tower of Babel (detail): Pieter Bruegel the Elder, 1563, oil on oak panel (Kunsthistorisches Museum, Vienna)

_MG_2195: photo by Filiberto Morales, 18 February 2017

The Tower of Babel (detail): Pieter Bruegel the Elder, 1563, oil on oak panel (Kunsthistorisches Museum, Vienna)

_MG_1674: photo by Filiberto Morales, 4 February 2017

The Tower of Babel (detail): Pieter Bruegel the Elder, 1563, oil on oak panel (Kunsthistorisches Museum, Vienna)

Great Wall at Mutianyu. The great wall - not yet reconstructed.: photo by niragag, 7 February 2011

The Construction of the Tower of Babel (The "little" Tower of Babel): Pieter Bruegel the Elder, c. 1563 (Museum Boijmans Van Beuningen, Rotterdam)

The Construction of the Tower of Babel (The "little" Tower of Babel): Pieter Bruegel the Elder, c. 1563 (Museum Boijmans Van Beuningen, Rotterdam

The Construction of the Tower of Babel (The "little" Tower of Babel) (detail): Pieter Bruegel the Elder, c. 1563 (Museum Boijmans Van Beuningen, Rotterdam

Franz Kafka: The Great Wall of China

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/e1/Brueghel-tower-of-babel.jpg

The Tower of Babel: Pieter Bruegel the Elder, 1563 (Kunsthistorisches Museum, Vienna)

First, it has to be said that achievements were brought to fruition at that time which rank slightly behind the Tower of Babel, although in the pleasure they gave to God, at least by human reckoning, they made an impression exactly the opposite of that structure. I mention this because at the time construction was beginning a scholar wrote a book in which he drew this comparison very precisely. In it he tried to show that the Tower of Babel had failed to attain its goal not at all for the reasons commonly asserted, or at least that the most important causes were not among these well-known ones. He not only based his proofs on texts and reports, but also claimed to have carried out personal inspections of the location and thus to have found that the structure collapsed and had to collapse because of the weakness of its foundation. And it is true that in this respect our age was far superior to that one long ago. Almost every educated person in our age was a mason by profession and infallible when it came to the business of laying foundations. But it was not at all the scholar’s aim to prove this. Instead he claimed that the great wall alone would for the first time in the age of human beings create a secure foundation for a new Tower of Babel. So first the wall and then the tower. In those days the book was in everyone’s hands, but I confess that even today I do not understand exactly how he imagined this tower. How could the wall, which never once took the form of a circle but only a sort of quarter or half circle, provide the foundation for a tower? But it could be meant only in a spiritual sense. But then why the wall, which was something real, a product of the efforts and lives of hundreds of thousands of people? And why were there plans in the book—admittedly hazy plans—sketching the tower, as well as detailed proposals about how the energies of the people could be strictly channeled into the new work in the future?

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/e6/WLANL_-_Quistnix%21_-_Museum_Boijmans_van_Beuningen_-_Toren_van_Babel%2C_Bruegel_-_detail.jpg

The Construction of the Tower of Babel (The "little" Tower of Babel), detail: Pieter Bruegel the Elder, c. 1563 (Museum Boijmans Van Beuningen, Rotterdam)

There was a great deal of mental confusion at the time—this book is only one example—perhaps for the simple reason that so many people were trying as hard as they could to join together for a single purpose. Human nature, which is fundamentally careless and by nature like the whirling dust, endures no restraint. If it restricts itself, it will soon begin to shake the restraints madly and tear up walls, chains, and even itself in every direction.

[Untitled]: photo by Tonatiuh Cabello, 22 September 2015

It is possible that even these considerations, which argued against building the wall in the first place, were not ignored by the leadership when they decided on piecemeal construction. We—and here I’m really speaking on behalf of many—actually first found out about it by spelling out the orders from the highest levels of management and learned for ourselves that without the leadership neither our school learning nor our human understanding would have been adequate for the small position we had within the enormous totality. In the office of the leadership—where it was and who sat there no one I asked knows or knew—in this office I imagine that all human thoughts and wishes revolve in a circle, and all human aims and fulfillments in a circle going in the opposite direction. But through the window the reflection of the divine worlds fell onto the hands of the leadership as they drew up the plans.

The Construction of the Tower of Babel (The "little" Tower of Babel), detail: Pieter Bruegel the Elder, c. 1563 (Museum Boijmans Van Beuningen, Rotterdam)

And for this reason the incorruptible observer will reject the notion that if the leadership had seriously wanted a continuous construction of the wall, they would not have been able to overcome the difficulties standing in the way. So the only conclusion left is that the leadership deliberately chose piecemeal construction. But building in sections was something merely makeshift and impractical. So the conclusion remains that the leadership wanted something impractical. An odd conclusion! True enough, and yet from another perspective it had some inherent justification. Nowadays one can perhaps speak about it without danger. At that time for many people, even the best, there was a secret principle: Try with all your powers to understand the orders of the leadership, but only up to a certain limit—then stop thinking about them. A very reasonable principle, which incidentally found an even wider interpretation in a later often repeated comparison: Stop further thinking, not because it could harm you—it is not at all certain that it will harm you. In this matter one cannot speak in general about harming or not harming. What will happen to you is like a river in spring. It rises, grows stronger, eats away more powerfully at the land along its banks, and still maintains its own course down to the sea and is more welcome as a fitter partner for the sea. Reflect upon the orders of the leadership as far as that. But then the river overflows its banks, loses its form and shape, slows down its forward movement, tries, contrary to its destiny, to form small seas inland, damages the fields, and yet cannot maintain its expansion long, but runs back within its banks, in fact, even dries up miserably in the hot time of year which follows. Do not reflect on the orders of the leadership to that extent.

The first turn of the Yangtze, at Shigu, Yunnan Province: photo by Jialiang Gao, 2003

Now, this comparison may perhaps have been extraordinarily apt during the construction of the wall, but it has at least only a limited relevance to my present report. For my investigation is merely historical. There is no lightning strike flashing any more from storm clouds which have long since vanished, and thus I may seek an explanation for the piecemeal construction which goes further than the one people were satisfied with back then. The limits which my ability to think sets for me are certainly narrow enough, but the region one would have to pass through here is endless.

The Tower of Babel (detail): Pieter Bruegel the Elder, 1563, oil on oak panel (Kunsthistorisches Museum, Vienna)

Against whom was the great wall to provide protection? Against the people of the north. I come from south-east China. No northern people can threaten us there. We read about them in the books of the ancients. The atrocities which their nature prompts them to commit make us heave a sigh on our peaceful porches. In the faithfully accurate pictures of artists we see these faces of damnation, with their mouths flung open, the sharp pointed teeth stuck in their jaws, their straining eyes, which seem to be squinting for someone to seize, someone their jaws will crush and rip to pieces. When children are naughty, we hold up these pictures in front of them, and they immediately burst into tears and run into our arms. But we know nothing else about these northern lands. We have never seen them, and if we remain in our village, we never will see them, even if they charge straight at us and hunt us on their wild horses. The land is so huge, it would not permit them to reach us, and they would lose themselves in the empty air.

The Construction of the Tower of Babel (The "little" Tower of Babel), detail: Pieter Bruegel the Elder, c. 1563 (Museum Boijmans Van Beuningen, Rotterdam)

So if things are like this, why do we leave our homeland, the river and bridges, our mothers and fathers, our crying wives, our children in need of education, and go away to school in the distant city, with our thoughts on the wall to the north, even further away? Why? Ask the leadership. They know us. As they mull over their immense concerns, they know about us, understand our small worries, see us all sitting together in our humble huts, and approve or disapprove of the prayer which the father of the house says in the evening in the circle of his family. And if I may be permitted such ideas about the leadership, then I must say that in my view the leadership existed even earlier. It did not come together like some high mandarins quickly summoned to a meeting by a beautiful dream of the future, something hastily concluded, a meeting which by evening saw to it that the general population was driven from their beds by a knocking on the door so that they could carry out the decision, even if it was only to set up a lantern in honour of a god who had shown favour to the masters the day before, so that he could thrash them in some dark corner the next day, when the lantern had only just died out. On the contrary, I imagine the leadership has existed since time immemorial, along with the decision to construct the wall as well. Innocent northern people believed they were the cause; the admirable and innocent emperor believed he had given orders for it. We who were builders of the wall know otherwise and are silent.

The Tower of Babel (detail): Pieter Bruegel the Elder, 1563, oil on oak panel (Kunsthistorisches Museum, Vienna)

Even back then during the construction of the wall and afterwards, right up to the present day, I have devoted myself almost exclusively to the histories of different people. There are certain questions for which one can, to some extent, get to the heart of the matter only in this way. Using this method I have found that we Chinese possess certain popular and state institutions which are uniquely clear and, then again, others which are uniquely obscure. Tracking down the reasons for these, especially for the latter phenomena, always appealed to me, and still does, and the construction of the wall is fundamentally concerned with these issues.

Nezahualcóyoltl, Mexico: photo by Tonatiuh Cabello, 30 May 2012

Now, among our most obscure institutions one can certainly include the empire itself. Of course, in Peking, right in the court, there is some clarity about it, although even this is more apparent than real. And the teachers of constitutional law and history in the high schools give out that they are precisely informed about these things and that they are able to pass this knowledge on to their students. The deeper one descends into the lower schools, the more the doubts about the students’ own knowledge understandably disappear, and a superficial education surges up as high as a mountain around a few precepts drilled into them for centuries, sayings which, in fact, have lost nothing of their eternal truth, but which remain also eternally unrecognized in this mist and fog.

Afternoon light on the gorge of the Yangzi River, Yunnan Province: photo by Peter Morgan, 2005

But, in my view, it’s precisely the empire we should be asking the people about, because in them the empire has its final support. It’s true that in this matter I can speak once again only about my own homeland. Other than the agricultural deities and the service to them, which so beautifully and variously fills up the entire year, our thinking concerns itself only with the emperor. But not with the present emperor. We would have concerned ourselves with the present one if we had recognized who he was or had known anything definite about him. We were naturally always trying—and it’s the single curiosity which consumed us—to find out something or other about him, but, no matter how strange this sounds, it was hardly possible to learn anything, either from pilgrims, even though they wandered through much of our land, or from the close or remote villages, or from boatmen, although they have travelled not merely on our little waterways but also on the sacred rivers. Of course, we heard a great deal, but could gather nothing from the many details.

The Construction of the Tower of Babel (The "little" Tower of Babel), detail: Pieter Bruegel the Elder, c. 1563 (Museum Boijmans Van Beuningen, Rotterdam)

Our land is so huge, that no fairy tale can adequately deal with its size. Heaven hardly covers it all. And Peking is only a point, the imperial palace only a tiny dot. It’s true that, by contrast, throughout all the different levels of the world the emperor, as emperor, is great. But the living emperor, a human being like us, lies on a peaceful bed, just as we do. It is, no doubt, of ample proportions, but it could be merely narrow and short. Like us, he sometimes stretches out his limbs and, if he is very tired, yawns with his delicately delineated mouth. But how are we to know about that thousands of miles to the south, where we almost border on the Tibetan highlands? Besides, any report which might come, even if it reached us, would get there much too late and would be long out of date. Around the emperor the glittering and yet murky court throngs—malice and enmity clothed as servants and friends, the counterbalance to the imperial power, with their poisoned arrows always trying to shoot the emperor down from his side of the balance scales. The empire is immortal, but the individual emperor falls and collapses. Even entire dynasties finally sink down and breathe their one last death rattle. The people will never know anything about these struggles and suffering. Like those who have come too late, like strangers to the city, they stand at the end of the thickly populated side alleyways, quietly living off the provisions they have brought with them, while far off in the market place right in the middle foreground the execution of their master is taking place.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/ea/Turmprozession.jpg

The Construction of the Tower of Babel (The "little" Tower of Babel), detail: Pieter Bruegel the Elder, c. 1563 (Museum Boijmans Van Beuningen, Rotterdam)

There is a legend which expresses this relationship well. The Emperor—so they say—has sent a message, directly from his death bed, to you alone, his pathetic subject, a tiny shadow which has taken refuge at the furthest distance from the imperial sun. He ordered the herald to kneel down beside his death bed and whispered the message to him. He thought it was so important that he had the herald repeat it back to him. He confirmed the accuracy of the verbal message by nodding his head. And in front of the entire crowd of those who have come to witness his death—all the obstructing walls have been broken down and all the great ones of his empire are standing in a circle on the broad and high soaring flights of stairs—in front of all of them he dispatched his herald. The messenger started off at once, a powerful, tireless man. Sticking one arm out and then another, he makes his way through the crowd. If he runs into resistance, he points to his breast where there is a sign of the sun. So he moves forward easily, unlike anyone else. But the crowd is so huge; its dwelling places are infinite. If there were an open field, how he would fly along, and soon you would hear the marvelous pounding of his fist on your door. But instead of that, how futile are all his efforts. He is still forcing his way through the private rooms of the innermost palace. He will never win his way through. And if he did manage that, nothing would have been achieved. He would have to fight his way down the steps, and, if he managed to do that, nothing would have been achieved. He would have to stride through the courtyards, and after the courtyards the second palace encircling the first, and, then again, stairs and courtyards, and then, once again, a palace, and so on for thousands of years. And if he finally did burst through the outermost door—but that can never, never happen—the royal capital city, the centre of the world, is still there in front of him, piled high and full of sediment. No one pushes his way through here, certainly not with a message from a dead man. But you sit at your window and dream to yourself of that message when evening comes.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/1c/WLANL_-_Quistnix%21_-_Museum_Boijmans_van_Beuningen_-_Toren_van_Babel%2C_Bruegel.jpg

The Construction of the Tower of Babel (The "little" Tower of Babel): Pieter Bruegel the Elder, c. 1563 (Museum Boijmans Van Beuningen, Rotterdam)

Indeed, procrastination is the true meaning of that noteworthy and often striking fullness of detail which according to Max Brod lay at the heart of Kafka's search for perfection and the true way. Brod observes: "Of all the aspects of life to be taken seriously, we may say what a girl in Das Schloss says of the enigmatic letters from the authorities -- namely that 'the reflections to which they give rise are interminable.'" But what Kafka enjoys about these interminable reflections is the very fear that they might come to an end.

Walter Benjamin: Franz Kafka: Beim Bau der Chinesischen Mauer (The Great Wall of China), radio talk broadcast July 1931, translated by Rodney Livingstone in Selected Writings, Volume 2: 1927-1934, 1999

Zeno of Elea's Racecourse Paradox: Suppose a runner needs to travel from a start S to a finish F. To do this he must first travel to the midpoint, M, and thence to F: but if N is the midpoint of SM, he must first travel to N, and so on ad infinitum (Zeno: ‘what has been said once can always be repeated’). But it is impossible to accomplish an infinite number of tasks in a finite time. Therefore the runner cannot complete (or start) his journey.

Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy

A boy peeks out of the window of his house in Nuevo Laredo, Tamaulipas state, Mexico, across the border from Laredo in the U.S, on Friday: photo by Rodrigo Abd/AP, 24 March 2017

"I would just move the company"

Ironhorse Loads up for NTC | by 1st BCT, 1st CD

Ironhorse loads up for the NTC. The 297th Inland Cargo Transfer Company, 180th Transportation Battalion, 13th Sustainment Command helps Company A of the 115th "Muleskinner" Brigade Combat Team, 1st Cavalry Division load and transport shipping containers to Fort Hood's railhead in preparation for the National Training Center.: U. S. Army photo by Pfc. Paige Pendleton, 1st Battalion Combat Team PAQ, 1stCavalry Division, 14 January 2014

The beauty pageant to build Trump's border wall is beginning: Proposal deadline is first step in a process that combines three of the president’s most successful ventures: pageants, reality TV competitions and xenophobia: Julia Carrie Wong in San Francisco for The Guardian, 29 March 2017

Wednesday marks the deadline for the hundreds of companies interested in building Donald Trump’s signature campaign promise – a “great, great wall” on the US-Mexico border – to submit concept papers detailing their proposals.

It is the first step in a process that promises to combine three of Trump’s most successful ventures: beauty pageants, reality TV competitions and xenophobia.

After an initial elimination round, the remaining contestants will submit more detailed technical proposals. Another round of cuts will ensue, and then a group of finalists will convene in San Diego, California, to construct both a 30ft-long prototype of their design and a 10ft by 10ft “mock-up” that will be used by the government to “test and evaluate the anti-destruct characteristics” of the design.

Think of it as a swimsuit competition followed by a high-stakes Apprentice challenge. Those who can withstand the battering ram for at least 90 minutes while also being “aesthetically pleasing” (on the US-facing side) have a shot at winning a lucrative piece of one of the US government’s largest infrastructure projects in decades.

The government’s initial pre-solicitation notice for the border wall asked for 30ft-tall “concrete wall structures”, but when the request for proposals was published on 17 March, the scope was expanded to allow for “other” proposals. So while some companies will move ahead with reinforced concrete, others can put forward ideas for alternative materials.

All proposals must meet some baseline standards, including being “physically imposing in height” with “anti-climb” features and “aesthetically pleasing” color on the north side. Non-concrete walls are also required to have a “see-through component” to increase “situational awareness”.

Matt Kaye of Integrated Security Corporation plans to submit a proposal with a group of other companies that calls for two chain-link fences with a “no man’s land in between” and his company’s intrusion detection systems in place. Kaye described the concept as a “typical correctional type fence” (his company has contracted for federal, state and local prisons) and said it would be “far less expensive and far less intrusive” than a concrete wall.

Liz Derr, the founder and CEO of artificial intelligence company Simularity, is proposing an “invisible or virtual wall” that uses AI software to analyze satellite and surveillance imagery to identify unusual activities.

Derr, who said that her company is “pro-immigration” and “pro-diversity”, argued that a hi-tech solution to border security could provide a 90% saving to the government, though she assumed her concept would not be chosen since it does not include any physical barrier.

Kalmar Rough Terrain Center has an alternative idea for that physical barrier: shipping containers.: photo by Steve Speakes / Kalmar via The Guardian, 29 March 2017

Steve Speakes, the president and CEO of Kalmar Rough Terrain Center, has an alternative idea for that physical barrier: shipping containers. Kalmar produces machines that can move shipping containers in difficult terrain, so Speakes is hoping that any winning contractor will be interested in his equipment. But he also strongly approved of the idea of using the containers themselves as the building blocks for the wall – as was proposed by a Florida architecture firm earlier this year. The “sustainable” design drew immediate backlash (one architecture site called it “the Bushwick of xenophobic nationalism”), but Speakes defended the concept.

“That is a very reasonable way to build a wall,” he said, noting that there is a surplus of containers available now due to a slowdown in global commerce.

Notably absent from the list of interested contractors are any of the large, multinational corporations that would probably have the capacity to carry out the 1,000, $21bn project.

[Untitled]: photo by Tonatiuh Cabello, 3 August 2015

Such companies may be put off by toxic politics surrounding the project (62% of Americans oppose building the wall, according to a February poll by the Pew Research Center), and the difficult path to actually funding it. The lack of name-brand bidders and challenge of getting the wall through Congress have led some to speculate that the San Diego prototype pageant will be as far as the project ever gets.

“The wall was a campaign promise,” said Phil Ting, a state assembly member from California. “The administration is probably trying to do the absolute minimum to gain the maximum press. I can see why they’d want to cause the biggest possible splash, and then go quietly away.”

After an initial elimination round, the remaining contestants will submit more detailed technical proposals for the wall: photo by Guillermo Arias/AFP via The Guardian, 29 March 2017

Ting, a Democrat from San Francisco, is one of several state and local legislators who are hoping to scare off potential bidders for the project with threats of blacklists and divestment.

“We don’t want a single California cent going toward building this wall,” Ting said of the Resist Wall Act, which would require the state’s two giant pension funds to divest from any companies that take part in building the wall. Ting compared the measure to the divestment campaigns against Apartheid South Africa.

Lawmakers in other states, including New York, Illinois and Arizona, have proposed barring any involved companies from receiving state contracts. The city of Berkeley, California, has already passed a boycott measure, and other municipalities are considering following suit.

Companies on the other side of the border are facing pressure as well. The Mexican government warned of reputational damage to firms that might be interest in providing materials for the wall, such as Cemex, a Mexican cement producer. The Catholic archdiocese of Mexico wrote in an op-ed that any participating company would be “immoral” and that its shareholders and owners “should be considered traitors to the homeland”.

Nezahualcóyoltl, Mexico: photo by Tonatiuh Cabello, 30 May 2012

Still, some businessmen are more interested in the morality of employing their workers than the morality of keeping out migrants. Speake, who said he’s had to lay off employees over the past two years, said the opportunity to work on the wall was “heaven sent”.

Ron Schoenheit, the president of Cascade Coil, an Oregon-based company that makes woven wire products, said that he would not be deterred by backlash.

“If we did get some work on this project and people found out about it, as liberal as the city of Portland is, they would probably come burn our factory down,” he said. But that wouldn’t stop him, he said.

“If it was a big contract, I would just move the company.”

from Kafka's Diaries: The real fun side of writing

The Tower of Babel (detail): Pieter Bruegel the Elder, 1563, oil on oak panel (Kunsthistorisches Museum, Vienna)

I am powerless.

The Tower of Babel (detail): Pieter Bruegel the Elder, 1563, oil on oak panel (Kunsthistorisches Museum, Vienna)

Complete standstill. Unending torments.

The Tower of Babel (detail): Pieter Bruegel the Elder, 1563, oil on oak panel (Kunsthistorisches Museum, Vienna)

How time flies; another ten days, and I have achieved nothing.

The Tower of Babel (detail): Pieter Bruegel the Elder, 1563, oil on oak panel (Kunsthistorisches Museum, Vienna)

A page now and then is successful, but I can't keep it up.

The Tower of Babel (detail): Pieter Bruegel the Elder, 1563, oil on oak panel (Kunsthistorisches Museum, Vienna)

A page now and then. The next day I am powerless.

The Tower of Babel (detail): Pieter Bruegel the Elder, 1563, oil on oak panel (Kunsthistorisches Museum, Vienna)

Complete standstill.

The Tower of Babel (detail): Pieter Bruegel the Elder, 1563, oil on oak panel (Kunsthistorisches Museum, Vienna)

I can't keep it up.

The Tower of Babel (detail): Pieter Bruegel the Elder, 1563, oil on oak panel (Kunsthistorisches Museum, Vienna)

You have to dive down, as it were,
and sink more rapidly
than that which sinks in advance of you.

The Tower of Babel (detail): Pieter Bruegel the Elder, 1563, oil on oak panel (Kunsthistorisches Museum, Vienna)

You have to dive down, as it were.

The Tower of Babel (detail): Pieter Bruegel the Elder, 1563, oil on oak panel (Kunsthistorisches Museum, Vienna)

Kafka's diaries show the real fun side of writing.: image via Matt Haig @matthaig1, 19 March 2017

Por aquí no pasó Dios: photo by Tonatiuh Cabello, 24 September 2015

A boy peeks out of the window of his house in Nuevo Laredo, Tamaulipas state, Mexico, across the border from Laredo in the U.S, on Friday: photo by Rodrigo Abd/AP, 24 March 2017

[Untitled]: photo by Tonatiuh Cabello, 4 March 2017

Franz Kafka: Building a Great Wall to Create a Secure Foundation for a New Tower of Babel / The real fun side of writing

Trending Articles

Practice Sheet of Right form of verbs for HSC Students

Download: FK ft Shenky – Nakuyewa ”Prod by: Shenky”

How to win at Markstrat (Markstrat Tips and Tricks) – Vodites

Ominde Commission Report and Recommendations – Ominde Report of 1964

Bureau of Internal Revenue: Regional Offices (Directory)

GO 53 on Enhancement of Ex-gratia upto 5 Lakhs Toddy Tappers in Telangana

Cakewalk CA-2A Leveling Amplifier v2.0.1.97 WiN, v2.0.1.96 OSX Incl Keygen

Mp3 Download: Mdu - Kunjenjenjena

How the kill the job , when DTP request running for long hours.

Microsoft Intune から展開しているアプリのアップデートについて

18-year-old girl was beaten for half an hour by two Northampton men in 'an...

Car crash in Dunton Bassett leaves driver in critical condition

Macky 2, Two Others In Road Accident

Application log 00000000000000089514: Could not convert queue DLVST90CLNT

Detroit mafia: D’Anna Brothers agree to plea deal

Delivery block field greyed out using VA02

Muloraki Au

【個人撮影】スマホのプライベート映像♪「中に出さないで///」カラオケ屋での生ハメ撮りが流出ｗ【リベンジポルノ】＠PornHub

BREAKING NEWS: Diamond Platnumz Is Reported Dead After Ghastly Car Accident

FIAT 500 B0111 B0112